Le Japon est-il une démocratie multinationale ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cet article est de dépasser les limites conceptuelles et typologiques de la littérature sur les minorités, le Japon multiculturel, et le Japon multiethnique en menant une réflexion critique quant aux mécanismes politiques, juridiques et discursifs d’exclusion et d’inclusion délimitant les normes de la subjectivité japonaise. À partir d’une analyse féministe de l’intersectionalité de la diversité situant la « race », la culture, le genre et l’hétéro-normativité comme systèmes d’oppressions qui se constituent mutuellement , nous examinerons également la littérature comparée sur la démocratie multinationale. Une fouille généalogique du passé colonial japonais, et l’étude d’un mariage multinational entre une japonaise et un Zainichi coréen nous permet de découvrir et de critiquer les contradictions juridiques et politiques des diverses facettes de la subjectivité et de l’appartenance (nation, diaspora, etc.) que le système du registre familial et la loi sur la nationalité reproduisent constamment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".