MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1516179454

The effect of ancillary volume on sound transmission measurements using ASTM standard test method E336

2006· article· en· W1516179454 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Frances King, Trevor Nightingale

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolume (thermodynamics)Sound transmission classAcousticsSound pressureSound (geography)Transmission (telecommunications)EngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ASTM Standard E336-05 provides methods to assess the airborne sound isolation between a source and receiving room. In certain field situations, the determination of what constitutes the source or receiving room and its volume may not be obvious. An example is a living room (principal volume) connected to a kitchen (ancillary volume) through an opening in the wall separating the two, and the party wall under test is a surface of the living room (principal volume). Some judgment may be required to define the volume and where the sound field of the "room" should be measured. The Standard requires that the ancillary volume be disregarded if the average sound pressure level in the ancillary volume is 6 or more decibels below the average level in the principal portion of the source or receiving room to which it is coupled at all measurement frequencies. Otherwise, the ancillary volume shall be included as part of the measurement space. This paper investigates the suitability of this criterion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207