Erythropoietin regulates hypoxic ventilation in mice by interacting with brainstem and carotid bodies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apart from its role in elevating red blood cell number, erythropoietin (Epo) exerts protective functions in brain, retina and heart upon ischaemic injury. However, the physiological non-erythroid functions of Epo remain unclear. Here we use a transgenic mouse line (Tg21) constitutively overexpressing human Epo in brain to investigate Epo's impact on ventilation upon hypoxic exposure. Tg21 mice showed improved ventilatory response to severe acute hypoxia and moreover improved ventilatory acclimatization to chronic hypoxic exposure. Furthermore, following bilateral transection of carotid sinus nerves that uncouples the brain from the carotid body, Tg21 mice adapted their ventilation to acute severe hypoxia while chemodenervated wild-type (WT) animals developed a life-threatening apnoea. These results imply that Epo in brain modulates ventilation. Additional analysis revealed that the Epo receptor (EpoR) is expressed in the main brainstem respiratory centres and suggested that Epo stimulates breathing control by alteration of catecholaminergic metabolism in brainstem. The modulation of hypoxic pattern of ventilation after i.v. injection of recombinant human Epo in WT mice and the dense EpoR immunosignal observed in carotid bodies showed that these chemoreceptors are sensitive to plasma levels of Epo. In summary, our results suggest that Epo controls ventilation at the central (brainstem) and peripheral (carotid body) levels. These novel findings are relevant to understanding better respiratory disorders including those occurring at high altitude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".