Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’oeuvre contemporaine reprend et intègre plusieurs des effets et des affects qui se produisent à la jonction de deux lieux principaux, l’espace de création et celui de diffusion, l’atelier et le musée. Cette stratégie n’est cependant pas nouvelle, et depuis le 19esiècle plusieurs artistes ont choisi de « muséifier » leur atelier. La contrainte du musée permet-elle de préserver et de transmettre l’essentiel de la démarche de création et sa portée polysensorielle? Les conditions de l’atelier : espace et lumière, les qualités tactiles et olfactives des matériaux et l’environnement des oeuvres qui subsistent peuvent-ils fournir au spectateur qui s’y engage une expérience différente de celle du musée, la rencontre avec une démarche artistique? Quatre types de musée-atelier (décor, galerie, inventaire, processus), définissent différents apprentissages qui plongent le visiteur dans une saisie plus complète de l’oeuvre perçue dans son lieu même.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.038 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".