MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1516462416

Homeless Women and Victimization: Abuse and Mental Health History among Homeless Rape Survivors

2001· article· en· W1516462416 on OpenAlex
Lana Stermac, Emily Paradis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVictimisationSexual abuseDomestic violenceMental healthSexual violencePhysical abusePoison controlSexual assaultVictimologyPsychologyPsychiatrySuicide preventionMedicineCriminologyMedical emergency
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the database of a hospital-based sexual assault care centre, this study examined data about previous and current victimization from homeless women clients and compared them to data from housed women clients. More homeless women than housed women reported childhood physical abuse, childhood sexual abuse, adult physical assault, previous sexual assault in adulthood, and a history of mental health problems. Among homeless women, 78.5 percent reported at least one previous incident of victimization; 23.7 percent said they had experienced all four types of violence. Of the recent sexual assaults for which the women were treated at the centre, those against the homeless women were more violent, and were more often perpetrated outdoors, by a stranger. Ramifications for treatment and prevention of abuse and homelessness are discussed.En partant de la base de donnees d'un centre hospitalier pour le traitment d'agression sexuelle, cette etude a compare les donnees touch ant a la victimisation d'un groupe de femmes sans abri a celles concernant un groupe de femmes logees. Un plus grand nombre de femmes sans abri que de femmes logees ont indique qu'elles avaient vecu l'abus sexuel et physiq ue en tant qu'enfants, et l'agression sexuelle et physique en tant qu'adultes, ainsi que des antecedents mentaux. Parmi les femmes sans abri, 78,5 pourcent ont indique qu'elles avaient vecu au moins un episode anterieur de violence; 23,7 pourcent d'entre elles ont dit qu'elles avaient vecu les quatre genres de violence. En ce qui concerne les agressions sexuelles recentes pour lesquelles les femmes ont ete trait& ea;es au centre, celles contre les femmes sans abri etaient plus violentes et un plus grand nombre d'entre elles ont ete commis par un etranger. L'artic le discute des solutions possibles, dont le traitement et la prevention de l'abus et du manque de logement.Research studies have documented high rates of various forms of childhood and adult victimization as well as mental health problems among homeless women. While many of these studies document prevalence rates of abuse, few provide details of abuse characteristics and specific mental health problems. In order to address these limitations within the literature, this study examined recent and previous victimization experiences as well as mental health problems among homeless women and a comparison group of housed women attending a sexual assault treatment centre.Numerous studies have documented the high rates of victimization among homeless women. In a study of homeless women in Toronto, Breton and Bunston (1992) found a 75 percent rate of lifetime physical and sexual abuse, most of which took place before the women became homeless. Another Toronto-based study of both homeless women and men (Ambrosio, Baker, Crowe, & Hardill, 1992) found that of 106 female participants, 46.2 percent, had been physically assaulted in the previous year and 43.3 percent had experienced sexual harassment and/or assault. An astonishing 21.2 percent of the women interviewed said that they had been raped at least once in the preceding year. Both studies found that the experience of multiple incidents and forms of abuse is the rule, rather than the exception, for homeless women (Ambrosio et al. 1992; Breton & Bunston, 1992). In their examination of sexual assaults, Breton and Bunston (1992) found that the majority of homeless women were assaulted by a known assailant, in a familiar place that was not public.American researchers also document very high rates of abuse and assault among homeless women. Simons and Whitbeck (1991) found that 43 percent of women in their sample had been raped by a father or father-figure in childhood. Anderson, Boe, and Smith (1988) report that two-thirds of their sample of homeless women experienced physical abuse in childhood, adulthood, or both. Almost half had been sexually assaulted at least once in their lifetime.Some subgroups of homeless women are at even greater risk for victimization. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it