MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1516596781 · doi:10.1109/icppw.2004.46

High-throughput interference-aware MAC protocols for heterogeneous ad hoc networks and multihop wireless LANs

2004· article· en· W1516596781 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceMultiple Access with Collision Avoidance for WirelessWireless ad hoc networkThroughputInterference (communication)Power controlWirelessAccess controlCollision problemCollisionHidden node problemWireless networkVehicular ad hoc networkWi-Fi arrayPower (physics)TelecommunicationsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose the interference-aware multiple access (IAMA) scheme for medium access control (MAC) in ad hoc networks and multihop wireless LANs. We propose various components such as spread spectrum and collision prevention techniques for IAMA and other existing/future protocols to achieve interference awareness and collision control. IAMA is the first distributed MAC scheme that can support interference-aware and collision-free transmissions without relying on busy tone or dual transceivers per mobile device. Enabled by its interference awareness, IAMA can naturally support efficient power-controlled variable-radius multiple access, power engineering, and directional antennas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it