Zebrafish Parla‐ and Parlb‐deficiency affects dopaminergic neuron patterning and embryonic survival
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many genes associated with familial Parkinson's disease contribute to mitochondrial morphology and function. Some of these genes, for example, Pink1 and Parkin, are part of a common pathway. The presenilin-associated rhomboid-like (PARL) gene was recently linked to familial Parkinson's disease. The PARL gene product is found in the inner mitochondrial membrane and cleaves the optic atrophy 1 protein, involved in mitochondrial morphology and apoptosis. In Drosophila, the PARL-related rhomboid-7 gene acts upstream of pink1 and parkin. However, such a genetic relationship is still unknown in vertebrates. Here, we show that the zebrafish genome comprises two parl paralogs: parla and parlb. Morpholino-mediated loss of parla and/or parlb function resulted in mild neurodegeneration, as evidenced by a lower density of dopaminergic neurons. Patterning of dopaminergic neurons was also perturbed in the ventral diencephalon. Morphants exhibited extensive cell death throughout the entire body as well as increased larval mortality. The morphant phenotype could be rescued by injection of human PARL mRNA, but not catalytically inactive PARL, suggesting functional conservation between the human and zebrafish proteins. More importantly, the zebrafish pink1 mRNA as well as the human PINK1 mRNA, but not kinase-dead nor Parkinson's disease-linked mutant PINK1 mRNA, also rescued the morphant phenotype, providing evidence that Parl genes may function upstream of Pink1, as part of a conserved pathway in vertebrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".