MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1516647809 · doi:10.1353/sex.2001.0053

Lesbian and Gay Rights in Canada: Social Movements and Equality-Seeking, 1971-1995 (review)

2001· article· en· W1516647809 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Churchill

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the History of Sexuality · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLesbianQueerPoliticsGender studiesGay rightsSocial movementPolitical scienceHomosexualitySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The modern lesbian and gay rights movement can trace its origins to the massive social and political upheavals in the United States during the late 1960s. Within a few short years, however, lesbian and gay politics had become a transnational phenomenon, generating vibrant cultural and political work far beyond the urban enclaves of New York and San Francisco. Thirty years later, the legal protection of lesbian and gay rights in countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada--not to mention most Western European democracies--outpaces by far those in the United States. As Miriam Smith aptly demonstrates in her invaluable study of the lesbian and gay rights movement in Canada, the last three decades represent a sea change in the legal standing of queer subjects and their protection from discrimination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the History of SexualitySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207