MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1516781663

Plato on Rethoric and Virtue

2002· article· pt· W1516781663 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas M. Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2002
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhetoricSOCRATESVirtueArgument (complex analysis)PhilosophyEpistemologyPrincipal (computer security)LinguisticsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sócrates (Platão) tinha uma frágil visão da Retórica como era praticada em sua época, em Atenas, o que não o inclinava a dignificá-la com o nome de arte. Tinha, ao mesmo tempo, uma noção vigorosa do que consistia uma genuína Arte da Retórica. Neste texto, planejo um sobrevôo nas suas opiniões sobre o assunto, baseando-me substancialmente em duas fontes principais, o Górgias e o Fedro, seguidos pelo que penso ser a principal força e fraqueza no seu argumento. Na sequência, questionarei sobre o peso do que ele tem para dizer (ou algo com respeito a isso, de qualquer modo), se é e poderá ser de interesse e preocupação.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.018
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207