MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517067303 · doi:10.5772/17795

Performance Study on Modern Ultra Wideband Monopole Antennas

2011· book-chapter· en· W1517067303 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelhalim Mohamed, L. Shafai

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandMagnetic monopoleUltra-widebandPhysicsComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proposed use of ultra wideband (UWB) technology in communication services has motivated the research towards more design and performance studies of modern UWB antennas, (FCC, 2002). Interference of UWB antennas with the existing technologies, phase centre stability of modern UWB antennas, low cross-polarization UWB antennas, high gain directional UWB antennas with stable phase centre, symmetrical Eand HPlane patterns and single or double linear polarization patterns are some of the important research topics nowadays. Monopole disc antennas, with circular, elliptical and trapezoidal shapes, have simpler two-dimensional geometries and are easier to fabricate compared to the traditional UWB monopole antennas with three-dimensional geometries such as spheroidal, conical and teardrop antennas. These disc monopole antennas can be designed to cover existing and upcoming UWB communication applications, (Honda et al., 1992) & (Hammoud & Colomel, 1993). In this study, different square, circular and elliptical disc monopole antenna geometries are designed and analysed for both omnidirectional and directional applications. The feeding structure is optimized to have a maximum impedance bandwidth starting at 3 GHz. One of the general principles of small-element antenna design is the outline design equivalence one. It states that an outline of a planar antenna element performs approximately like the original planar one, (Mohamed & Shafai, 2007) and (Schantz, 2005). In this chapter, a study is made on the gradual removal of metal from the interior of all studied antennas while keeping the impedance and radiation characteristics unchanged. The minimum metal width that could be achieved is about 50% from the total radiator area. The effect of implementing a notch close to the feeding structure on impedance bandwidth is also studied. It is found that implementing notches close to the trident-feeding strip structure did not increase the impedance bandwidth of circular and elliptical antennas. Further, implementing a notch decreased the impedance bandwidth of the square monopole antenna. On the other hand, removing metal from the interior structure of the square, circular and elliptical monopoles gives the same impedance bandwidth for square and circular monopole but increased the bandwidth of the elliptical one. The circular and elliptical monopole antennas with metal removed showed better omnidirectional behaviour at higher frequencies. The performance of a UWB quasi-circular monopole, with rectangular and trapezoidal ground planes was studied, (Wu et al., 2010). It was shown that antenna with trapezoidal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInTech eBooksSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207