MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Círculo hermenêutico-dialético como sequência didática interativa

2012· article· pt· W1517074913 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo é um desdobramento da Metodologia Interativa, que foi construída durante o processo de elaboração de uma tese de doutorado na Universidade de Sherbrooke (US) – Quebec-Canadá, cuja temática foi analisar um projeto bilateral Brasil-Canadá. Com base nesta metodologia desenvolvemos uma ferramenta didática que denominamos Sequência Didática Interativa (SDI). Neste trabalho, apresentamos o resultado de duas experiências com aplicação da SDI, sendo a primeira em uma universidade pública, e outra, em uma faculdade da rede particular de ensino. Pelos resultados obtidos, é possível afirmar que a utilização do CHD, por meio de uma sequência didática interativa, facilita a dialogicidade e criatividade na produção de um novo conhecimento.Résumé: Cet article est un déploiement de la Méthodologie Interactive qui fut construite pendant le processus d’élaboration d’une thèse de doctorat à l’Université de Sherbrooke – Québec, Canada, dont la thématique fut d’analyser un projet bilatéral Brésil-Canada. Partant de la base de cette méthodologie, nous avons mis au point un outil didactique que nous dénominons Séquence Didactique Interactive (SDI). Dans ce travail, nous présentons le résultat de deux expériences, la première dans une université publique et l’autre dans une faculté privée d’enseignement à Recife, PE. D’après les résultats obtenus, il est possible d’affirmer que l’utilisation de la SDI, dans le processus d’apprentissage facilite le fait de dialoguer et la créativité dans la production d’une nouvelle connaissance.Mots-clés: méthodologie interactive; outil didactique; séquence didactique interactive.Abstract: A this paper is an offshoot of the Interactive Methodology, which was built during the process of preparing a doctorate thesis at the University of Sherbrooke (U.S.) – Quebec-Canada, whose theme was to analyze a bilateral project Brazil-Canada. Based on this methodology, we developed a teaching tool named Interactive Teaching Sequence (ITS). In this work, we present the results of two experiments, the first in a public university and the other in a college of private schools in Recife. By the results, it is possible to state that the use of ITS, in the teaching-learning process facilitates the dialog and creativity in producing a new knowledge.Keywords: interactive methodology; teaching too; interactive teaching sequence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it