Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta investigacion pretende recomendar criterios de politicas publicas para fortalecer en lo institucional al Ministerio de la Proteccion Social con el proposito de desarrollar la integracion del componente de salud y del proceso de reforma en salud dentro del Sistema de proteccion social. Este componente es transversal para el bienestar de la poblacion, su importancia para la generacion de capital humano lo convierten en la piedra angular de cualquier sistema de proteccion social. El estudio es de caracter exploratorio el cual incluye un analisis comparativo de las reformas en salud que han desarrollado aplicaciones del concepto de proteccion social para los casos de Canada, Chile y Mexico, con respecto al caso colombiano. La investigacion analiza las implicaciones de las reformas para avanzar en la proteccion social en salud. La funcion de modulacion o stewardship del Ministerio, se encuentra como fundamental para adelantar las relaciones politicas y estrategicas dentro del sistema en aras de consolidar la integracion de la salud y su reforma dentro del Sistema de proteccion social. La investigacion concluye con una serie de recomendaciones para integrar la salud a la proteccion social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".