MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517158911 · doi:10.1109/qels.2002.1031174

Measuring H/sub 2//sup +/ vibrational wavepackets with sub-femtosecond precision

2003· article· en· W1517158911 on OpenAlexaff
P. B. Corkum, H. Niikura, François Légaré, R. Hasbani, Misha Ivanov, D. M. Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttosecondWave packetPhysicsAtomic physicsElectronFemtosecondIonizationLaserIonOpticsUltrashort pulseQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. A major effort is underway throughout the world to develop single attosecond optical pulses or trains of attosecond pulses based on the physics of high harmonic generation. During high harmonic generation, an electron is removed from the atom by a strong laser field. The electric field causes it to move a large distance from the atom, only to drive it back when the laser field reverses its direction. High-harmonics are produced during the electron-ion collision that can follow. The duration of the electron-ion collision, usually referred to as "re-collision", largely determines the duration of the attosecond photon pulse. The electron wave packet can also be used to probe the parent ion. Although only one electron can be involved, we adopt the language of electron beams to draw attention to the potential applications of re-collision electrons. We characterize the unusually large current density and the very brief duration seen by the ion with one-femtosecond precision. To do this, we ionize H/sub 2/ molecules, forming simultaneously two wave packets. One is a vibrational wave packet in H/sub 2//sup +/ and the other is the electron wave packet that we wish to study. By forming them together we can use the initial motion of the vibrational wave packet as a very fast clock (1/2-vibrational period /spl sim/ 7.5 fs) against which we measure the electron wave packet motion. We observe the re-collision, and measure the current density, by observing the kinetic energy of the protons released by the fragmentation of H/sub 2//sup +/ upon double ionization or collisional excitation. The kinetic energy resolution determines the time resolution of the "clock" to be /spl sim/ 1 fs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207