Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partant d’enquêtes ethnologiques, cet article examine les transformations du travail en Ouzbékistan, où le régime actuel, qui a fait de l’identité nationale sa nouvelle idéologie d’État, maintient des formes d’assujettissement héritées de l’Union soviétique. L’auteur montre l’ampleur des changements touchant au travail dans sa pratique, son contexte social et les représentations qui s’y greffent. L’article détaille trois situations significatives des nouvelles configurations du travail : marchés de main d’oeuvre, équipes d’ouvriers du bâtiment, usine de filature. Il examine comment les représentations du travail s’attachent à la différenciation des sexes, et comment la circulation des revenus au sein de la maisonnée neutralise les velléités d’autonomisation individuelle et renforce les structures de parenté. Le mariage apparaît comme un opérateur clé, motif essentiel des dépenses et enjeu symbolique crucial du renouveau de l’identité nationale, qui impose l’obéissance aux cadets et l’asservissement aux jeunes épouses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".