MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517236561 · doi:10.1002/0470018860.s00664

Phonology, Neural Basis of

2005· other· en· W1517236561 on OpenAlexaff
KG Munhall

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Cognitive Science · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhonologyRepresentation (politics)Basis (linear algebra)PerceptionComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)LinguisticsPsychologyNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceNeuroscienceMathematicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The phonology of a language includes a representation of the set of sounds used in the language and a representation of the rules for producing and perceiving the sounds in sequences. Clinical evidence from aphasic patients indicates that phonological impairment on language perception and production results from both anterior and posterior cortical lesions. Functional imaging research has confirmed this pattern and using these techniques a more detailed neural mapping of the neural basis of phonology is beginning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Cognitive ScienceSame topicNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFrench-language works237,207