MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517382357

Front Lines and Frontiers: War as Legitimate Work for Nurses, 1939–1945

2007· article· en· W1517382357 on OpenAlex
Cynthia Toman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Conflict Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElitePolitical scienceSociologyNursingHumanitiesHistoryMedicineLawArtPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over 4,000 nurses served with the Canadian armed forces during the Second World War, comprising a second generation of military nurses known by rank and title as Nursing Sisters. Military medical records and personal accounts reveal that military nurses enjoyed an elite professional status based on their relative closeness to the front lines of combat and to the frontiers of medical technology. Reductions in morbidity and mortality rates were frequently attributed to the presence of Nursing Sisters in forward field units. While Nursing Sisters capitalized on their position within the armed forces to enhance their expertise and develop expanded practice roles, such efforts were contingent on geographical setting, the availability of physicians and medical orderlies, and the social construction of medical technologies as men’s or women’s work. Flexibility and autonomy were more evident closer to the front lines, where patient acuity was higher, skilled personnel fewer, and risk-taking more acceptable. Such flexible boundaries, however, were “for the duration” only. Plus de 4 000 infirmieres ont servi dans les forces armees canadiennes durant la Deuxieme Guerre mondiale, formant une deuxieme generation d’infirmieres militaires. On decouvre a l’etude des dossiers medicaux militaires et des recits personnels que les infirmieres militaires jouissaient d’un statut professionnel d’elite du fait d’etre a proximite relative des zones de combat et aux premieres loges de la technologie medicale. La reduction des taux de morbidite et de mortalite etaient souvent attribuee a la presence des infirmieres militaires dans les unites de campagne sur les fronts de guerre. Si les infirmieres militaires profitaient de leur position au sein des forces armees pour gagner en expertise et accroitre leur role de praticiennes, de tels efforts etaient fonction de l’emplacement geographique, de la disponibilite de medecins et de preposes aux soins et de la construction sociale voulant que les technologies medicales soient du ressort des hommes ou des femmes. Il y avait davantage de souplesse et d'autonomie pres des lignes de front, ou l’acuite des besoins du patient etait plus grande, le personnel qualifie, moins nombreux et les risques, plus acceptables. Cette flexibilite ne valait toutefois que « pour la duree » du conflit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it