Mechanism of reaction of myeloperoxidase with hydrogen peroxide and chloride ion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of myeloperoxidase compound I (MPO-I) with chloride ion is widely assumed to produce the bacterial killing agent after phagocytosis. Two values of the rate constant for this important reaction have been published previously: 4.7 x 106 M-1.s-1 measured at 25 degrees C [Marquez, L.A. and Dunford, H.B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30434-30440], and 2.5 x 104 M-1.s-1 at 15 degrees C [Furtmüller, P.G., Burner, U. & Obinger, C. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 17923-17930]. The present paper is the result of a collaboration of the two groups to resolve the discrepancy in the rate constants. It was found that the rate constant for the reaction of compound I, generated from myeloperoxidase (MPO) and excess hydrogen peroxide with chloride, decreased with increasing chloride concentration. The rate constant published in 1995 was measured over a lower chloride concentration range; the 1998 rate constant at a higher range. Therefore the observed conversion of compound I to native enzyme in the presence of hydrogen peroxide and chloride ion cannot be attributed solely to the single elementary reaction MPO-I + Cl- --> MPO + HOCl. The simplest mechanism for the overall reaction which fit the experimental data is the following: MPO+H2O2 ⇄k-1k1 MPO-I+H2O MPO-I+Cl- ⇄k-2k2 MPO-I-Cl- MPO-I-Cl- -->k3 MPO+HOCl where MPO-I-Cl- is a chlorinating intermediate. We can now say that the 1995 rate constant is k2 and the corresponding reaction is rate-controlling at low [Cl-]. At high [Cl-], the reaction with rate constant k3 is rate controlling. The 1998 rate constant for high [Cl-] is a composite rate constant, approximated by k2k3/k-2. Values of k1 and k-1 are known from the literature. Results of this study yielded k2 = 2.2 x 106 M-1.s-1, k-2 = 1.9 x 105 s-1 and k3 = 5.2 x 104 s-1. Essentially identical results were obtained using human myeloperoxidase and beef spleen myeloperoxidase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".