MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517441235 · doi:10.1353/esc.2009.a404824

End in Tears: Understanding Grief and Loss in D’Arcy McNickle’s The Surrounded

2009· article· en· W1517441235 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
January Lim

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGriefSorrowPsychoanalysisResistance (ecology)HistoryGender studiesSociologyPsychologyAestheticsLiteratureArtPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

End in Tears: Understanding Grief and Loss in D’Arcy McNickle’s The Surrounded January Lim (bio) Every single of these villages was construrted of families with relatives in other villages. Rivers of tears must have been shed. Death must have become so commonplace that we ceased to grieve. No, grief became so constant we ceased to want to live. We have never stopped grieving. Lee Maracle In 1978, more than four decades after it first appeared, D’Arcy McNickle’s The Surrounded returned to print and began to gain critical currency1 What I hope to accomplish in this essay is to reconsider the complexity of the cultural and historical effects of Indian sufferings and to situate these effects as ways in which the Indian people negotiate sociality while surviving grief and loss. As a literary meditation on psychical and cumulative layers of racial sorrow, the novel tracks the etiology, and the totality, of female grief. McNickle reminds us of all that is incommensurable, all that is contradictory in a world of discipline and punishment, [End Page 145] socio-political control, and sanctioned violence. I hope to offer a relevant, although by no means exhaustive, analysis of the women’s sorrow and how their actions elucidate the cultural, historical, and land losses the Salish people endured. While critical scholars have examined the construction of manhood and masculinity, less attention has been given to interlocking notions of gender and constructions of grief, loss, and resistance in the novel.2 Consider, for example, the claim made by Louis Owens in “Maps of the Mind: John Joseph Mathews and D’Arcy McNickle”: “In the resulting role reversal, those who act forcefully and attempt with disastrous results to control events are the women, Faithful Catharine and Elise La Rose, both of whom coerce an unwilling Archilde into the mountains and in the mountains commit murder in defense of their men” (70). Although apprehending the importance of the women’s activism to the narrative, Charles R. Larson describes Catharine and Elise’s confrontation with the law as an action “committed without forethought” (91). Robert Dale Parker’s “Who Shot the Sheriff” cautions against “prescriptive realism,” an interpretive approach which “dictates that characters must be ‘positive role models,’ strong sensitive women and strong (but not too strong) sensitive men” (926). Parker notes that although Elise “is the only major character that critics have mostly ignored” (923), she is characterized by reviewers as “profane and [End Page 146] reckless, without morals or regard for the law of either race” (924). While Parker’s article articulates many well-researched and insightful readings of gender identity and federal Indian policy, it ends by positing rational expression as the answer to the women’s actions rather than addressing the broader historical and social context that constructs the women stricken in pain: “ The Surrounded calls out not only for more agency and resistance from men, but also for more purposeful agency at large, as opposed to the impulsive, unmediated reflexes of Catharine’s revenge, Elise’s private quarrel, or Louis’s greed” (923). We should not conflate gender and actions with nonspecificity; on the contrary, McNickle’s text alerts us to the stakes and context in how gender is read. The novel begins with Archilde Leon returning home from Portland to visit his Indian mother Catharine and Spanish father Max Leon, who live in separate dwellings in the valley of Sniél-emen. Archilde’s brother, Louis, is alleged to have stolen horses and the law officers are “hunting him” (28). While on a ritual hunting trip, Archilde, Louis, and their mother meet the game warden Dan Smith, who shoots and kills Louis. At the sight of Louis’s violent death, the grief-stricken Catharine kills the game warden. Later, Elise, Archilde, and his nephews, Mike and Narcisse, try to escape from the law officers by fleeing to the mountains with the sheriff’ in hot pursuit. When the sheriff comes up to their camp and pounces on them, Elise shoots him in an attempt to protect Archilde. Meanwhile, both Mike and Narcisse mount and ride off amid the shooting, and the text ends with the Indian agent’s apprehension of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207