Inventing or Recalling the Contact Zones: Transcultural Spaces in Amitav Ghosh's The Shadow Lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Space as a place of contact as well as conflict is an important dimension in the oeuvres of Indian novelist Amitav Ghosh. This paper sets out to address the representation of transcultural in Ghosh's memory novel The Shadow Lines . By recalling and imagining the interplay between private and political lives, Ghosh's narrator/protagonist commemorates a Bengali family saga in post-independence India. By spreading the story over diverse geographical and landscapes in which memory and imagination reinvents historical reality, Ghosh highlights how the shadows of imaginary and remembered spaces haunt all characters in the novel as they struggle to narrate their personal and collective histories to each other. At the same time, these shadows in the form of national boundaries not only manipulate private and political spheres, but also demonstrate an individual's lifelong struggles to win over artificial borders, invading the space of home, territory, and motherland. Thus by examining connectedness and separation, Ghosh uses the fate of nations (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) to offer observations about a profoundly complex political conflict in the post-partition subcontinent between two major ethnic communities of Hindus and Muslims.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".