MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Germ Cell Testis Tumors

2006· other· en· W1517535561 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Chung, Hans‐Joachim Schmoll

Bibliographic record

VenueTNM Online · 2006
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerm cell tumorsSeminomaOncologyStage (stratigraphy)MedicineTesticular cancerChemotherapyInternal medicineGerm cellBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Prognostic factors are of major importance for the treatment and cure of patients with testicular cancer. The histologic type, seminoma versus nonseminomatous germ‐cell tumors (NSGCT) and the (TNM) stage constitute the fundamental prognostic factors that govern clinical practice. For early stages, prognostic factors are the critical determinants for the decisions about treatment. They don't necessarily predict the survival, which is greater than 98% independent of treatment strategy, but for the risk of relapse with different treatment options. In advanced stages, prognostic factors indicate the chance of survival following chemotherapy, either first‐line or salvage. In this chapter, the different prognostic factors, relevant for decision making in early and late stage germ‐cell testis tumors, are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTNM OnlineSame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207