MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517591850

KAJIAN JENDER TERHADAP PERKAWINAN SEJENIS (KHUSUSNYA HOMOSEKSUAL)DI INDONESIA

2007· dissertation· id· W1517591850 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMarriage and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeIndonesianMarriage lawDerogationShariaLawLesbianNormativeAdulterySociologyGender studiesPolitical sciencePsychologyIslamPhilosophyTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gender's knowledge about marriage by couples of the same sex (special for homosexual couple) in Indonesia Marriage by couples of the same sex is not legal by law in Indonesia but there are many couples of the same sex who get married in other countries which the marriage by couples of the same sex is legal or just live together without marriage. In this writing there are two problems that appear. Firstly, how marriage by couples of the same sex (special for homosexual couple) viewed by gender's perspective and connected to Indonesian Marriage act. Secondly, how the reality of marriage by couples of the same sex in Indonesia connected to Indonesian Marriage acts. This law research using normative law research. Data source using secondary data consist of primary law substance and secondary law substance. Vertically law systematization using derogation principle with basis of law conduct is lex superior derogate legi inferiori. Horizontally law systematization using noncontradiction principle with basis of law conduct is lex specialist derogate legi generalist. This writing using deductive principle to get the conclusion. Marriage by couples of the same sex, by homosexual couple or lesbian couple can be correct if it is looking at from gender because position of the man as a husband changes to be a wife and the other way position of the woman as a wife changes to be a husband. In Indonesia, marriage by couples of the same sex is not legal by law. Because the Indonesian marriage acts only legalize marriage by a man and a woman (marriage by the different sex). So if the couples by same sex want to get married, they must go to the other countries which the marriage by couples of the same sex is legal, like Netherland, Canada, or Spanish. In Jakarta, there is one foundation named Arus Pelangi who gives facilities for couples of the same sex to make an agreement if they want to live together but they are not married. This Agreement is made for couples of the same sex when they want to live together and mixed their property. So if they separated, there is not property struggle between them. This foundation also give law protect for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transsexual in Indonesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarriage and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207