MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1517595132 · doi:10.3138/tric.21.1.27

"It Was Our North Land That We Saw": Willard Mack and The Great Northwest

2000· article· en· W1517595132 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ches Skinner

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHollywoodChoseCriticismArt historyPerformance artHistoryArtLiteratureLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Willard Mack (a.k.a. Charles W. McLaughlin) was born in Ontario, Canada, in 1887 and at an early age moved to the United States where he spent most of his adult life involved in the theatre and film as a playwright, actor, and director. At the time of his death in Hollywood in 1934, Mr. Mack had written over forty plays, mostly adaptions of popular stories and novels or extensions of vaudeville pieces; none of them stands up to criticism and certainly none is to be found among the canon of great works, yet most of them were produced on Broadway and toured both the U.S.A. and Canada and placed the author in the company of the leading popular writers and performers of that time. Even though Willard Mack was an American, he maintained contact with Canada and chose to set a number of his plays, such as Tiger Rose and The Scarlet Fox in northern Alberta. This paper deals with Mack's image of the North in terms of his claimed connection to the region and the people he wrote about and portrayed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0290.013
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre Research in Canada→Same topicAmerican Environmental and Regional History→French-language works237,207→