MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517739792

Echo control in VoIP

2007· article· en· W1517739792 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Samy El-Hennawey

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcho (communications protocol)Voice over IPMicrophoneComputer scienceTelephonyPhoneComputer networkTelecommunicationsAcousticsThe InternetPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The challenges faced in echo control in voice over the Internet Protocol (VoIP) are discussed. There are primarily two classes of echo in telephone conversation. The first class is due to the use of a 2-to-4 wire conversion using hybrid circuits. Echo control of this class is achieved by a line echo canceller (LEC). The other class is due to the use of handsfree mechanisms where there is significant acoustical feedback coupling between the receiver speaker and the receiver microphone. Echo control of this class is achieved using an acoustic echo canceller (AEC). The design of double-talk detectors is a challenge for VoIP gateway design. Another challenge seen in deploying VoIP with voice gateways to interface with PSTN is that some PSTN local loops have strange characteristics. It is highly desirable to measure echo at the end user of an IP phone with multi-vendor networks. An important impairment, that is to be measured, is echo with its echo path loss and its associated round-trip delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207