MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517768864 · doi:10.7202/045794ar

Les chênes et les vignes du monastère des Augustines de l’Hôpital Général de Québec

2011· article· fr· W1517768864 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Denys Delâge

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers des dix · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le patrimoine horticole des communautés religieuses du Canada français est méconnu et négligé. À l’Hôpital Général de Québec, fondé en 1692, nous avons contribué à identifier deux chênes blancs anciens (Quercus alba L.) et une vigne, probablement le cultivar August Giant. il y eut déjà probablement de l’Amber Queen et peut-être du Pocklington. il n’existe pas de traces de la culture de la vigne à l’Hôpital Général avant 1894. Les jardins des Augustines nourrissaient à l’année l’Hôpital et le monastère produisant l’ensemble de fruits et légumes cultivables sous le climat de Québec. Ajoutons le tabac, un ersatz du café (fèves gourganes, Vicia Faba Major), le miel. Les pratiques horticoles s’inspiraient dès le XIX e siècle du meilleur savoir scientifique en agriculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers des dixSame topicHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchFrench-language works237,207