MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1517931453 · doi:10.1002/mame.201500045

Influence of Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) Percent and Lignin Type on the Properties of Lignin/PEO Blend Filament

2015· article· en· W1517931453 on OpenAlex
Qiaozhen Yu, Addie Bahi, Frank Ko

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Materials and Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceEthylene oxideLigninThermal stabilityProtein filamentChemical engineeringComposite materialEthylenePolymerOrganic chemistryCopolymerChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three types of lignin/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) blend filaments with different PEO percent were prepared by melt spinning. The effects of PEO percent and lignin type on the morphology, mechanical property, and thermostability of the blend filaments were systematically studied. The morphologies of the filaments were observed by optical microscope. The mechanical properties of the filaments were measured with an Instron model Isx. The results showed that the effect of lignin/PEO blending ratio was not a simple function of PEO content. The flexibility of the lignin/PEO filament increases as thermal stability decreases. A 15% PEO content produces the best combination of filament performance, such as uniform diameter, smooth surface, adequate mechanical property, and thermal stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it