Bibliographic record
Abstract
Once upon a time, political scientists used the term homo economicus to refer to the rational, calculating, utility-maximizing agent of Rational Choice Theory (Hollis, 2002). That homo did not have a sexual orientation—at least in theory. Today, the concept conjures images of gay men toting GAP bags, wearing Prada shoes and redecorating some hopelessly unfashionable straight guy’s apartment while giving him a personal makeover—and you can watch it all unfold weekly on the boob tube (Queer Eye for the Straight Guy). Plus, you can shop where the queer guys shop and buy the stuff the queer guys buy since all the corporate logos are prominently displayed and promoted on the show. Talk about flaunting it. The gay, white, youthful male has become (or arguably has always been, he is just more visible now) the frontline gay representative. He is ushering in the next phase of gay liberation, complete with increased media attention, corporate sponsorship and the adoration of “faghags ” everywhere (Cho, 2001, p. 37). I call it the McQueer phase. And I am not blaming the gay, white male for the commodification and misrepresentation of gay identity. Indeed, that poor chap is getting the short end of the stick as well. Rather, I am concerned that what many are toting as
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".