MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On the Finite Capacity Shortest Queue Problem

2011· article· en· W1518079757 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charles Knessl, Haishen Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in applied mathematics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurke's theoremBulk queueQueueFork–join queuePoisson distributionMathematicsComputer scienceApplied mathematicsComputer networkQueue management systemStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider two parallel queues. There is one server tending to each queue and the capacity of each queue is K . The network is fed by a single Poisson arrival stream of rate λ, and the two servers are identical exponential servers working at rate µ. A new arrival is routed to the queue with the smaller number of customers. If both have the same number of customers then the arrival is routed randomly, with the probability of joining either queue being 1/2. If there are more than 2 K customers in the system, further arrivals are turned away and lost. We let ρ = λ/µ and take K →∞, and consider the cases ρ 2 and ρ − 2 = O ( K − 1 ). We shall obtain asymptotic approximations to the joint steady state distribution of finding m customers in the first queue and n in the second. The asymptotic approximations are shown to be quite accurate numerically. We shall identify precisely for what ranges of m and n can the finite capacity model be approximated by the infinite capacity one. We will also show that the marginal distribution of finding n customers in the second queue undergoes a transition when ρ = 4. Key words: Shortest queue problem; Finite capacity; Poisson arrival stream; Analytical approximations

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in applied mathematicsSame topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207