MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1518189237 · doi:10.5772/10277

Detect Structure Features of Asymmetric and Symmetric CH2 and CH3 Functional Groups and Their Ratio of Biopolymers within Intact Tissue in Complex Plant System Using Synchrotron FTIRM and DRIFT Molecular Spectroscopy

2010· book-chapter· en· W1518189237 on OpenAlexafffund
Peiqiang Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueBiopolymers · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMagnetic and Electromagnetic Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersBrookhaven National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSynchrotronSpectroscopyChemistryMaterials scienceCrystallographyPhysicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synchrotron light is photon beam, which is million times brighter than sunlight. A synchrotron facility is a giant particle accelerator that turns electrons into light (Wikipedia, 2010). How a Synchrotron Works? Electric Gun (EG: Synchrotron Component 1) in a synchrotron blasts out electrons. The electrons are accelerated to nearly speed of light by Linear Accelerator (LA: Synchrotron Component 2). A small synchrotron orbiting Booster Ring (BR: Synchrotron Component 3) increase their energy. Finally electron bunches enter Storage Ring (SR: Synchrotron Component 4). The bunches orbit ring controlled by serial magnets. Special magnet called "Undulator" causes electrons to rapidly change course and vast emitting energy in form of photons. Then photons enter Beamline (BL: Synchrotron Component 5) and directed to device called "monochromator" which selects specific wavelength required for each experiment. Finally, light focus onto sample at Experimental End Station (ES: Synchrotron Component 6), where scientists collect data to determine molecular structure The extremely bright synchrotron light makes it possible to detect biomaterial structure (make-up or conformation) at both molecular and cellular levels (Marinkovic & Chance, 2006;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiopolymersSame topicMagnetic and Electromagnetic EffectsFrench-language works237,207