MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1518202114 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab47

47 BOVINE OOCYTE CYTOPLASM SUPPORTS NUCLEAR REMODELING BUT NOT REPROGRAMMING OF MURINE FIBROBLASTS

2004· article· en· W1518202114 on OpenAlex
N.-H. Kim, M.R. Shin, S.H. Park

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsBiologyCell biologyMicrotubuleFibroblastPremature chromosome condensationMolecular biologyChromatinCell cultureGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nuclear transfer (NT) is used to elucidate fundamental biological functions such as cell differentiation reversibility and interactions between the cytoplasm and nucleus. In the present study, we compared nuclear and microtubule dynamics in bovine oocytes following NT of bovine and murine fibroblast cells. To clarify the nuclear reprogramming procedures, we additionally examined the expression of development-related genes (Octamer-binding transcription factors, Oct-4; E-cadherin, E-cad) and housekeeping genes (Heat shock protein 70.1, Hsp; Bos taurus apoptosis regulator box-a, Bax; Glucose transporter 1, Glut-1) in bovine embryos that had received nuclei from bovine and murine fibroblast cells. Bovine oocytes were matured in vitro and enucleated after 22 h. The oocytes reconstructed with mouse embryonic fibroblast cells or bovine somatic fibroblast cells were cultured in CR1aa media. While the embryos that received nuclei from bovine fibroblast cells developed into blastocysts, those that received nuclei from murine fibroblasts did not develop beyond the 8-cell stage. Similar nuclear and microtubule dynamics were observed in oocytes reconstructed with murine and bovine fibroblast cells. A small microtubule aster-containing ?-tubulin spot was observed in association with decondensed chromatin following NT of mouse fibroblasts. Within 1 h of fusion of enucleated, non-activated cytoplasm, most mouse fibroblast nuclei were transformed to premature chromosome condensation (PCC). Randomly arrayed microtubules were tightly associated with PCC and formed meiotic-like microtubular spindles in all cases. Condensed chromosomes were divided into two or three chromatin masses and developed into multiple pronuclear-like structures. Microtubule asters were observed near the pronuclear-like structures during apposition in the cytoplasm. Two poles of the ?-tubulin spot evident at the mitotic metaphase stage are involved in the formation of the astral microtubule spindle for initial mitosis. A number of housekeeping mouse genes (hsp70, bax and glt-1) were abnormally expressed in embryos that had received nuclei from mouse fibroblast cells. However, development-related genes, such as Oct-4 and E-cad, were not expressed. The results collectively suggest that the bovine oocyte cytoplasm supports nuclear remodeling, but not reprogramming of mouse fibroblast cells. Table 1 Relative abundance of mRNA expression (mean ± SEM) in mouse and xenonuclear-transferred (X-NT) embryos

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it