MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1518269741 · doi:10.1023/a:1014350004255

Sinonasal cancer and occupational exposures: a pooled analysis of 12 case–control studies

2002· article· en· W1518269741 on OpenAlexaff
Danièle Luce, Annette Leclerc, Denis Bégin, Paul A. Demers, Michel Gérin, E. Orlowski, Manolis Kogevinas, Stefano Belli, I. Bugel, Ulrich Bolm‐Audorff, Louise A. Brinton, Pietro Comba, Lennart Hardell, Richard B. Hayes, Corrado Magnani, Enzo Merler, Susan Preston‐Martin, Thomas L. Vaughan, Wei Zheng, Paolo Boffetta

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Causes & Control · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Surgical Oncology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioAsbestosConfidence intervalEpidemiologyJob-exposure matrixAdenocarcinomaLogistic regressionCancerInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.016
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations139
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCancer Causes & ControlSame topicHead and Neck Surgical OncologyFrench-language works237,207