MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1518439606 · doi:10.3138/jcs.48.2.146

La double vie d’une même anthologie: <i>15 poètes du Québec</i> au Mexique et en Argentine

2014· article· fr· W1518439606 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Madeleine Stratford

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2008 paraît au Mexique 15 Poetas de Quebec, une anthologie de poésie québécoise coéditée par les Écrits des Forges et Mantis Editores. Deux ans plus tard, la même anthologie est retraduite en Argentine, cette fois coéditée par Leviatan. Le fait que les Écrits des Forges diffusent coup sur coup la même sélection de poèmes en espagnol contribue certes à former un certain canon de la poésie québécoise. Cependant, il convient de se demander si les deux versions espagnoles présentent ledit canon sous un même jour ou si elles en projettent deux images distinctes. D’une part, cet article vise à caractériser l’identité québécoise que les Écrits des Forges ont projetée avec cette anthologie. D’autre part, en examinant la traduction des marques distinctives du français québécois parmi les poèmes sélectionnés, il cherche à étudier comment les deux versions espagnoles ont rendu cette image en langue cible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian StudiesSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207