MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1518694959

“Draw a Squirrel Cage”: The Politics and Aesthetics of Unemployment in Irene Baird’s Waste Heritage

2007· article· en· W1518694959 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Herb Wyile

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBourgeoisieIndividualismCapitalismMarxist philosophyPoliticsWorking classDissentSociologyClass consciousnessAestheticsMultinational corporationHistoryLiteratureArtLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a paucity of fictional depictions of and critical engagement with class and work in Canadian literature, a fact that makes study of Irene Baird’s 1939 novel, Waste Heritage , doubly worthwhile. This neglected text draws heavily on the Canadian class struggles of the late 1930s and, in a muted metafictive spirit, grapples with how best to convey them in writing. Through her writer figure, Kenny Hughes, Baird questions the efficacy of a traditionally bourgeois, individualist genre like the novel to express working-class, collective dissent. Baird focuses on select characters that, though individuated, function as the “everyperson.” The formal preoccupations and social consciousness of her novel render it not only a valuable record of an epoch in Canada’s history, but also an increasingly relevant literary model for understanding and reacting to class relations in the age of multinational capitalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0410.032
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207