MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W151877949

"Hardly the Voice of the Same Man": "Civil Disobedience" and Thoreau's Response to John Brown

2007· article· en· W151877949 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œMidwest quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicThoreau and American Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInjusticePoliticsCivil disobedienceLawWitnessHistoryPolitical scienceSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How rarely meet with a man who can be free, even in thought! We live according to rule. Some men are bedridden; all, world-ridden. Henry David Thoreau. Journal, May 10, 1857 HENRY DAVID THOREAU LIVED in a society teeming with political strife. In introduction to Thoreau: People, Principles, and Politics, Milton Meltzer writes that was born in time to hear reminiscences of the American Revolution from local survivors of those battles, and he died as the War was creating another generation of veterans (ix). Thoreau's life was framed by that helped to shape the political and cultural borders of America. Further, he was witness to the use of violent action as a means of effecting political change. However, he himself was not an activist, at least not violent; rather, as Michael Meyer points out, his greatest strengths as a social critic was diagnoses (Black Emigration, 380). Rather than committing himself to any use of physical warfare, Meltzer continues, [h]e was committed to another ... against injustice and (ix). Meltzer contrasts Thoreau's inner war of conscience to the outer wars against the Indians and Mexico, that Thoreau took no active part in (unless one reads night in jail for refusing to pay taxes as an overt act). In either ease, what is important to note here is the non-confrontational nature of Thoreau's political activism. Although political injustice was a complaint as old as the country itself, slavery was bringing the country closer to imminent warfare. Fugitive Slave Law of 1851 increased the outrage of Northern abolitionists--including Thoreau--and helped to strike the match that would eventually help spark the War (1861-1865). An informed and civic-minded thinker who spent much time writing on own thoughts (often revising journals into public addresses), Thoreau's writings from the period reflect own understanding of and responses to various contemporary issues. Specifically, Thoreau's pieces in support of John reflect views on the issue of slavery in the United States. However, one cannot simply read A Plea for Captain John Brown (1859) and The Last Days of John Brown (1860) and appreciate Thoreau's political and ethical arguments. In order to understand the complexities and contradictions that are often noted in these two pieces, one must read them as a development in political thinking, specifically with regard to the issue of slavery--a development that runs through Civil Disobedience (1849) and in Massachusetts (1854). Although Thoreau's sympathies to John and violence are seemingly more extreme than earlier statements in Civil Disobedience, such a change reflects not a break with Transcendental ideals but rather the identification of metaphysical ideals in the person of John More specifically, Thoreau's seemingly contradictory attempts to link ethics to John Brown's acts represent the move from the abstract and more general world of ideas (Civil Disobedience) to the more concrete world of politics (Slavery in Massachusetts and A Plea for John Brown), before turning once again to the abstract and universal in The Last Days of John Brown. Thoreau was not the only public figure to champion Brown's friend Frederick Douglass voiced support in a now-famous letter of October 31, 1859, in the Rochester Democrat (though widely reprinted). Having fled to Canada for fear of arrest as an accomplice at Harpers Ferry, Douglass states that I am ever ready to write, speak, publish, organize, combine, and even to conspire against Slavery (qtd. in Quarles, 9). However, Douglass's letter was inspired primarily to answer a charge of cowardice made by John E. Cook, one of Brown's captured conspirators. Douglass notes that Mr. Cook may be perfectly right in denouncing me as a coward. have not one word to say in defense or vindication of my character for courage (8). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it