MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1518843022

Investigating Tom1 as a Candidate Regulator of Ptch1

2012· article· en· W1518843022 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michelle Audrey Crawford

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegulatorComputer scienceBiologyGeneticsGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sonic hedgehog (Shh) is a signaling molecule that is involved in patterning the embryo and regulates adult stem cell homeostasis. Patched1 (Ptch1) is the receptor for Shh and upon binding to Shh is endocytosed, allowing downstream signaling to occur. Ptch1 is critical to the cellular response to Shh because it is both a negative regulator of the Shh signaling pathway and a transcriptional target of the pathway. Therefore, the regulation of Ptch1 levels will directly affect the ability of cells to respond to Shh. Understanding this process requires the characterization of novel Ptch1-interacting proteins that regulate Ptch1 levels in the cell. This thesis investigated a role for the adapter protein Tom1 as a putative Ptch1-interacting protein involved in regulating Ptch1 levels through endocytic cycling. It was found that Tom1 overexpression did not regulate the patterning of vertebrate nervous system, but did play a role the sub-cellular localization of Ptch1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZFrench-language works237,207