MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1519225834

In Situ Stabilization of Lead in Groundwater – Two Case Studies from Brazil

2013· article· pt· W1519225834 on OpenAlexaff
Josephine Molin, Jim Mueller, Eduardo Pujol, Alan G. Seech, Cibele Vicino Witier Salvador

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
Canadian institutionsConestoga College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterIn situLead (geology)Environmental scienceWater resource managementGeologyHydrology (agriculture)GeographyGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringMeteorology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EHC-M® tem se mostrado eficaz na imobilização de chumbo (Pb) nas águassubterrâneas, em dois locais no Brasil; 1) uma antiga fábrica de reciclagem de bateriaslocalizada no interior do Estado de São Paulo e 2) uma fábrica ativa localizada no Rio deJaneiro. Em ambos os casos, o objetivo foi a correção do pH, para imobilizar o Pb in-situ elimitar a migração da pluma. Para este fim, foi conduzida a injeção de EHC-M parapromover a precipitação de Pb solúvel na forma de sulfetos estáveis. O EHC-M combinaliberação controlada de fonte de carbono, ferro zero-valente (ZVI) e lenta liberação deenxofre. Após a aplicação do EHC-M no subsolo, uma combinação de reações químicas ebiológicas irão estabelecer condições extremamente redutoras combinado com elevadosníveis de ferro reduzido e sulfeto, condição em que o Pb dissolvido irá precipitar na formade galena e também será adsorvido como óxidos de Fe estáveis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicElectrokinetic Soil Remediation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207