<i>DhARO4</i> induction and tyrosine nitration in response to reactive radicals generated by salt stress in <i>Debaryomyces hansenii</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been previously reported that growth of Debaryomyces hansenii in 2 M NaCl induced the expression of ARO4. This gene codifies for DhAro4p, involved in the synthesis of the amino acid tyrosine. In this work we studied the activity of DhAro4p upon salt stress; a higher activity was observed in cells grown with 2 M NaCl, but tyrosine levels were not increased. On the other hand, the addition of tyrosine to the saline medium significantly enhanced the growth of D. hansenii. It was found that the oxidized form of tyrosine, 3-nitrotyrosine, increased in the presence of salt. Since NaCl protects against oxidative stress in D. hansenii (Navarrete et al., 2009), we propose that a protective pathway is the de novo synthesis of tyrosine and its immediate oxidation to 3-nitrotyrosine to counteract oxidative stress generated by salt stress, so we measured the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO⁻) in D. hansenii after growing in 2 M NaCl. Results showed the presence of NO⁻ and the increased production of ROS; this is probably due to an increased respiratory activity in the cells grown in the presence of salt. Our results demonstrate that upon salt stress D hansenii responds to oxidative stress via the transcriptional activation of specific genes such as DhARO4.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".