Global security governance : competing perceptions of security in the 21st century
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction 1. Regional and Global Security: Changing Threats and Institutional Responses Part 1: Europe 2. France: Between Exceptionalism and Orthodoxy 3. Germany: From a Reluctant Power to a Constructive Power? 4. Italy: New Ambitions and Old Deficiencies 5. United Kingdom: Punching above its Weight 6. European Union: The European Security Strategy versus National Preferences Part 2: North America 7. Canada: Taking Security Seriously after 11 September? 8. United States: The Unrelenting Search for an Existential Threat in the Twenty-First Century Part 3: Eurasia 9. China: Security Cooperation with Reservations 10. Japan: Recasting the Post-War Security Consensus 11. Russia: Struggling for Dignity Conclusion 12. Regional or Global Security Cooperation? The Vertices of Conflict and Interstices of Cooperation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it