Bibliographic record
Abstract
En examinant les résultats d’entrevues effectuées à Iqaluit en 2003 avec 35 personnes d’origine inuit, cet article tente de mettre en lumière les perceptions des répondants quant à la situation langagière dans le Nord après la création du Nunavut. L'article cherche à répondre à deux questions principales: 1) Croit-on que la valeur pratique de l’inuktitut — en tant qu’outil donnant accès au pouvoir social et politique, au marché du travail et au monde extérieur — a augmenté (ou est en voie d’augmentation) depuis la création du Nunavut? 2) Pense-t-on que le comportement langagier (plus particulièrement le choix entre l’inuktitut et l’anglais) a changé ou devrait changer suite à l’avènement du Nunavut? L'analyse des entrevues permet de conclure à l'apparition à Iqaluit d'un marché linguistique alternatif au sein duquel l'inuktitut possède une valeur fortement positive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".