MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1519589583 · doi:10.1515/crelle-2014-0151

Existence and uniqueness of minimizers of general least gradient problems

2015· preprint· en· W1519589583 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods in inverse problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsOmegaUniquenessCounterexampleCombinatoricsBounded functionMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Motivated by problems arising in conductivity imaging, we prove existence, uniqueness, and comparison theorems – under certain sharp conditions – for minimizers of the general least gradient problem <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mo>inf</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo>∈</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>B</m:mi> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>V</m:mi> <m:mi>f</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>Ω</m:mi> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mo>⁡</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mo>∫</m:mo> <m:mi>Ω</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>φ</m:mi> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>D</m:mi> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:mi>u</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> \inf_{u\in BV_{f}(\Omega)}\int_{\Omega}\varphi(x,Du) , where <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo>:</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo>∂</m:mo> <m:mo>⁡</m:mo> <m:mi>Ω</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>→</m:mo> <m:mi>ℝ</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> f:\partial\Omega\to\mathbb{R} is continuous, <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>B</m:mi> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>V</m:mi> <m:mi>f</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>Ω</m:mi> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo>:=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo>{</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>v</m:mi> <m:mo>∈</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>B</m:mi> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:mi>V</m:mi> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>Ω</m:mi> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo>:</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mo>lim</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>r</m:mi> <m:mo>→</m:mo> <m:mn>0</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mo>⁡</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:munder> <m:mrow> <m:mpadded> <m:mi>ess</m:mi> </m:mpadded> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:mi>sup</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>y</m:mi> <m:mo>∈</m:mo> <m:mi>Ω</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo>|</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>-</m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>|</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mo>&lt;</m:mo> <m:mi>r</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:munder> <m:mo>⁡</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo>|</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo>-</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>v</m:mi> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it