MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1519679644 · doi:10.21831/medikora.v0i1.4577

KEMAMPUAN MOTORIK PESERTA EKSTRAKURIKULERBOLABASKET SMA N 3 BANTUL

2015· article· id· W1519679644 on OpenAlexaff
Asep Prasetyo dan Bernadeta Suhartini

Bibliographic record

VenueMEDIKORA · 2015
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kemampuan motoriksiswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 3 Bantul, Kecamatan Bantul, KabupatenBantul.Metode penelitian ini adalah deskriptif dan teknik pengambilan datamenggunakan tes. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah semua siswa yangmengikuti ekstrakurikuler bolabasket di SMA N 3 Bantul yang berjumlah 40siswa. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh populasi yang bejumlah 40siswa. Pengumpulan data kemampuan motorik diukur menggunakan tes denganmengukur komponen motorik yang meliputi Lari 30 M, Sit up, Basketball throwfor distance, Lompat jauh tanpa awalan, Sit&reach, Lari bolak-balik 4x5 M, Squatdi dinding.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang berkategori sangatbaik sebanyak 0 siswa atau sebesar 0,0%, kategori baik sebanyak 0 siswa atausebesar 0,0%, kategori sedang sebanyak 22 siswa atau sebesar 55%,kategori kurang sebanyak 18 siswa atau sebesar 45%, dan kategori kurang sekali0 siswa atau sebesar 0,0%. Dari hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwakemampuan motorik siswa ekstrakurikuler bolabasket di SMA N 3 Bantul tahun2012 dalam kategori sedang.Kata Kunci: kemampuan motorik, bolabasket

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.213
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMEDIKORASame topicSports and Physical Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207