Mechanisms of Termination of Atrial Fibrillation by Class I Antiarrhythmic Drugs:
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sodium channel blocking drugs (Class I antiarrhythmic agents) have been used for the termination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and for sinus rhythm maintenance for almost 100 years. Despite this long history, the mechanisms that underlie their efficacy in AF remain poorly understood. Classic notions about the determinants of cardiac reentry, as embodied in leading circle theory, and of AF, as reflected in the multiple wavelet hypothesis, suggest that cardiac conduction slowing should promote, rather than prevent, AF. This article reviews the evidence (both clinical and experimental) for the efficacy and mechanisms of action of Class I antiarrhythmic agents in AF. Application of mathematical models of AF to the evaluation of Class I mechanisms is discussed, and recent insights into the latter are presented. A better understanding of the ways in which Na+ channel blockers affect AF will be useful, not only for new antiarrhythmic drug development but also for gaining insight into the mechanisms of the arrhythmia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".