Regularized phase tomography enables study of mineralized and unmineralized tissue in porous bone scaffold
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regularized phase tomography was used to image non-calcified fibrous matrix in in vitro cell-cultivated porous bone scaffold samples. 3D micro-architecture of bone and bone scaffold has previously been studied by micro-computed tomography, synchrotron radiation (SR) micro-computed tomography and microdiffraction. However, neither of these techniques can resolve the low-calcified immature pre-bone fibrous structures. Skelite porous scaffold discs were seeded with osteoblasts, a combination of osteoblast and pre-osteoclasts and, as controls, with pre-osteoclasts only, and then cultivated for 8 weeks. They were subsequently imaged using SR propagation-based phase contrast imaging. Reconstructions using a regularized holographic phase tomography approach were compared to standard (absorption) SR micro-computed tomography, which show that quantitative analysis, such as volume and thickness measurements, of both the calcified fraction and the immature bone matrix in the reconstructed volumes is enabled. Indications of the effect of this type of culture on Skelite, such as change in mineralization and deposit of mature bone on the walls of the scaffold, are found. The results are verified with a histological study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it