MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Regularized phase tomography enables study of mineralized and unmineralized tissue in porous bone scaffold

2010· article· en· W1519733209 on OpenAlexaff
Max Langer, Yan Liu, Federico Tortelli, Peter Cloetens, Ranieri Cancedda, Françoise Peyrin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microscopy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTomographyMaterials scienceScaffoldBiomedical engineeringX-ray microtomographyMatrix (chemical analysis)Bone matrixMineralization (soil science)PorosityChemistryAnatomyComposite materialRadiologyMedicineCartilage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regularized phase tomography was used to image non-calcified fibrous matrix in in vitro cell-cultivated porous bone scaffold samples. 3D micro-architecture of bone and bone scaffold has previously been studied by micro-computed tomography, synchrotron radiation (SR) micro-computed tomography and microdiffraction. However, neither of these techniques can resolve the low-calcified immature pre-bone fibrous structures. Skelite porous scaffold discs were seeded with osteoblasts, a combination of osteoblast and pre-osteoclasts and, as controls, with pre-osteoclasts only, and then cultivated for 8 weeks. They were subsequently imaged using SR propagation-based phase contrast imaging. Reconstructions using a regularized holographic phase tomography approach were compared to standard (absorption) SR micro-computed tomography, which show that quantitative analysis, such as volume and thickness measurements, of both the calcified fraction and the immature bone matrix in the reconstructed volumes is enabled. Indications of the effect of this type of culture on Skelite, such as change in mineralization and deposit of mature bone on the walls of the scaffold, are found. The results are verified with a histological study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of MicroscopySame topicAdvanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207