MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1519779222

2008 USDA-CSREES National Water Conference Sparks, NV

2008· article· en· W1519779222 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert B. McCall

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipWatershedWildlifeEnvironmental resource managementNatural resourceEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceRecreationWater qualityWatershed managementGeographyEnvironmental protectionBusinessPolitical scienceEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Text: The Maumee Basin Watershed encompasses Ohio, Michigan and Indiana which drains to Lake Erie, the most biologically productive of the Great Lakes. The Western Lake Erie Basin (WLEB) Partnership began in 2005 with collaborations between USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) with the signing of a partnership agreement. The agreement states the two agencies will collaborate on watershed planning and implementation; wetland creation, restoration, and enhancement; and natural disaster recovery. In Ohio, the NRCS and USACE signed a regional agreement supporting the activities outlined in the national agreement, focusing on the Western Lake Erie Basin. In March 2006, a WLEB Partnership charter was signed by fourteen agencies and organizations and partnership bylaws were adopted. NRCS roles and responsibilities include performing rapid assessments for each 8-digit sub-watershed of the Maumee Basin Watershed to identify current resource conditions on private lands, recommend systems to solve identified problems, and estimate (quantitative and/or qualitative) on-farm effects. Farm Bill land treatments have also been implemented in collaboration with Environmental Defense, Ohio Farm Bureau Federation, the Conservation Action Project, and Soil and Water Conservation Districts, including special farmer-focused initiatives under Environmental Quality Incentives Program to improve water quality in the WLEB. Farmers in the St. Mary, Tiffin, Grand Lake St. Mary, and Blanchard River Watersheds can participate. USACE roles and responsibilities include a comprehensive WLEB Study to investigate measures to improve fish and wildlife habitat, navigation, flood damage reduction, recreation, and water quality in the Maumee, Ottawa and Portage River watersheds. Continuing Authorities Projects (CAP's) will allow for the planning, design and construction of relatively small projects. The CAP programs have two phases: feasibility, and design and implementation. This poster identifies Water Quality accomplishments in the Western Lake Erie Basin through NRCS, USACE and the WLEB Partnership efforts. Impact Statement: With the development of NRCS' Rapid Assessment tool, USACE Comprehensive WLEB study, and collaborating partners, the WLEB Partnership is improving water quality utilizing communities and watershed groups in eight sub-watersheds in the Western Lake Erie Basin. In collaboration with NRCS, USACE, Environmental Defense, and other partners, improvements include a data profile that contains various maps and GIS layers with explanatory text and tables including digital elevation, land cover, land use trends, riparian zone analysis, soils information, agricultural statistics, conservation practice improvements, local watershed group activities, and various other sets of water resource data. For additional information, visit www.wleb.org

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2200.107

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics→French-language works237,207→