MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1519783030

The Ship Owner's Lien on Sub-freights and Personal Property Securities Regimes

2014· article· en· W1519783030 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew J. Woolley

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLaw, logistics, and international trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLienBusinessStatutory lawAccounts payablePersonal propertySubsidiaryDebtProperty (philosophy)Security interestLawLaw and economicsFinanceEconomicsPolitical scienceMultinational corporationPayment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the event of default by a head charterer, a ship owner may advance a direct claim under the bill of lading against the shipper for freight, with an alternative claim against the charterer to enforce the charterparty lien on sub-freights. With maritime-related insolvencies increasingly common these claims are important to ship owners as they provide another method of debt recovery. This article explores the contentious ship owner’s lien on sub-freights payable to the charterer. Clear guidance on the nature of the lien has particular importance in New Zealand, Australia, Canada and other countries where statutory personal property securities regimes are operated. Finally, the article considers the nature of the lien in the light of the policy rationale underlying personal property securities regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian and New Zealand Maritime Law JournalSame topicLaw, logistics, and international tradeFrench-language works237,207