MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1519885944 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2001.941210

Nose shape estimation and tracking for model-based coding

2002· article· en· W1519885944 on OpenAlexaff
Lijun Yin, Anup Basu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionFeature extractionCoding (social sciences)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)TemplateFace (sociological concept)NostrilFacial expressionNoseMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feature extraction on the face plays an important role in applications of model based coding and human face recognition. Traditionally, the eyes and mouth are considered to be the most significant features contributing to different facial expressions. However, detecting and tracking the nose shape is non-trivial, and plays an equally important role as eyes and mouth for model based coding, especially for analysis and synthesis of realistic facial expressions. A feature detection method on the facial organ areas is presented. Individual templates are designed for the nostril and nose-side. First, the feature regions are limited to certain areas by using two-stage region growing methods. Second, the pre-defined templates are applied to extract the shape of the nostril and nose-side. Finally, the extracted feature shapes are exploited to guide a facial model to complete an accurate adaptation. The advantage of the proposed scheme is demonstrated by experiments on real video sequences for low bit rate video coding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207