Développement durable et économie environnementale régionale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent ouvrage, pour lequel ont collaboré des chercheurs belges, français et canadiens, aborde dans un premier temps des concepts de développement durable en économie avant de les appliquer, dans un second temps, à des problématiques régionales. Les méthodes d’évaluation de la durabilité, l’analyse du cycle de vie ainsi que l’étude du développement soutenable comme un problème d’innovation technique permettent de mieux comprendre et de pouvoir évaluer l’impact de nos actions en termes de soutenabilité. L’implémentation régionale qui s’en suit, qu’elle soit théorique ou empirique, traite, entre autres, de l’impact de la pollution par le bruit des aéroports sur les riverains, d’interactions entre système économique et services écosystémiques pour des nourriceries de poissons, ou de calculs d’indicateurs et de mesures de bien-être sur base de statistiques régionales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".