MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1520004593 · doi:10.1002/rnc.3117

Stability and stabilization of piecewise‐affine slab systems subject to Wiener process noise

2013· article· en· W1520004593 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Raouf, Luís Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMultiplicative noisePiecewiseControl theory (sociology)MathematicsMultiplicative functionAffine transformationLyapunov functionNoise (video)Stability (learning theory)Convex optimizationRegular polygonMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsComputer scienceNonlinear systemMathematical analysisControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The main contribution of this paper is to propose a convex formulation of sufficient conditions for both stability analysis and synthesis of stabilizing controllers for stochastic piecewise affine (PWA) systems with multiplicative noise. One of the main difficulties in PWA systems is the fact that the affine terms in the dynamics make it extremely difficult to formulate the synthesis problem as a convex optimization or even convex feasibility program. The presence of multiplicative noise modeled as a Wiener process adds an additional level of difficulty to the analysis and synthesis procedures. Sufficient conditions for stability of stochastic PWA slab systems in the mean square sense are developed first using a stochastic globally quadratic Lyapunov function. Second, PWA state feedback controllers are designed such that the closed‐loop system is stochastically exponentially mean square stable. The conditions for both stability and stabilization are formulated as LMIs, which can then be solved efficiently using currently available software packages. A numerical example shows the effectiveness of the approach. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear ControlSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207