OLDEST OLD IN THE HOUSEHOLD: THE FAMILY AS UNIT OF CARE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJETIVO: O estudo objetivou analisar como a família se organiza enquanto unidade de cuidado a idosos mais velhos no espaço domiciliar, com base no Modelo Calgary de Avaliação Familiar. MÉTODO: Estudo de caráter qualitativo, descritivo. A coleta dos dados ocorreu por meio de entrevistas, avaliando três núcleos familiares. RESULTADOS: Baseados nas categorias que compõe o Modelo e na análise de conteúdo analisaram-se os aspectos da estrutura, desenvolvimento e funcionamento das famílias, abrangendo a dinâmica socioeconômica da organização familiar, o papel do idoso e sua influência na relação familial, a necessidade de cuidado, aspectos emocionais e vínculo afetivo que (re)organizam a estrutura familiar. CONCLUSÃO: A relação familiar e a complexidade dos vínculos que o idoso mantém são fundamentais para a preservação de sua saúde, especialmente nos aspectos relativos à dependência de cuidados. Considera-se importante maior inserção da equipe de enfermagem nesse espaço visando adequar a assistência em saúde à organização familiar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".