Bibliographic record
Abstract
I read with interest the article by (Simonson et al. 2014) about the oxygen dissociation curve of Tibetans and Chinese at 4200 m altitude who have slightly lower P50 [P50 is the partial pressure of oxygen (O2) at which hemoglobin is 50% saturated] than sea-level residents. I expected to see these findings compared with those of our own recent study (Balaban et al. 2013), which was the first to assess the in vivo O2 dissociation curve of sea-level and altitude residents and also reported that, in contrast to findings from in vitro studies, there was a pH-related reduction in P50 in subjects at altitude compared with sea-level subjects. However, the authors did not refer to our article; neither did the associated commentary (Naeije, 2014). We find it inexplicable that prior work very relevant to these experiments was not discussed and compared. Moreover, that this omission was missed by expert reviewers and editors is troubling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".