Analysis of Financial Structure of the Serbian Banking Sector: Impact of the Financial Crisis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we will analyse financial structure of the banking sector in the Republic of Serbia and based on it conclude whether the financial crisis had an effect on it. The financial sector and banks especially got affected by the recent financial crisis. There are a considerable number of papers that address this issue, but they usually refer to the banking sector of developed countries. Therefore, the research sample in this paper covers the banking sector in Serbia – 31 commercial banks, considering their importance for Serbian economy and their overall reputation. We have analysed financial statements of these banks that submitted quarterly from 2009 to the third quarter of 2012. We have calculated the main financial ratios regarding the financial structure, which has been used for financial analysis of the banking sector by other authors. Results of the research show that the value of banks’ liquid funds in the observed period fell considerably, as did the investments in fixed assets. Furthermore, indebtedness of banks rose in the period from mid-2010 to end-2012, but banks’ liquidity remained at the same level, on average.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".